cancer treatment involving certain types of chemotherapy or Taking Clomid can lead to an increase in testosterone and sperm count. the type of bacteria that can cause stomach ulcers, may
Clomid, as it can harm the fetus or baby. Women who have a history of ovarian cysts, ovarian cancer, or uterine cancer should also avoid taking Clomid. In
Long-term use of Clomid may increase the risk of ovarian cancer. Clomid should not be used for more than about six cycles. Talk to your doctor about the risks of taking this medication. As mentioned, Clomid can cause visual disturbances and impair your ability to drive or operate heavy machinery.
This raises a troubling question: Can hormonal changes during pregnancy cause cancer? Clomid; others show a decrease; still others, an
Goodrx oracea is a north american species Clomid for treating breast cancer, clomid for menopause and clomid for fertility.
Clomid and HER 2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer. I took Clomid for all 3 pregnancies. Highest dose of 200mg a month. Total of 7 doses. First dose at age of 26. Diagnosis of Metastatic Breast Cancer HER 2 positive at 45 years old. I have always questioned if Clomid caused the Cancer. You can contact me for more information at
It works by blocking the estrogen receptors in cancer cells, preventing cancer growth and spread. However, in % of women Clomid can thin the endometrial
In rare cases, Clomid can cause more serious side effects, including Clomid has also been used in the treatment of hormonesensitive cancers, such as breast
Goodrx oracea is a north american species Clomid for treating breast cancer, clomid for menopause and clomid for fertility.
Comments
thank you
lee
I also don't think that it causes cancer in the numbers they say. I don't know if it's car exhaust, pestisides, or all the genetically engineered and enriched food we eat but something that is disapearing couldn't cause more cancer to spread.
Personally I never wanted to smoke, even though I had been in smoke filled places and seen others smoking, until the anti-smoking adds started appearing on TV. Now every time I see one I want to light up. I haven't though and I don't plan too but still, maybe there's a conspiracy in that?
But men don't have cervices so why should we care about that?
The only cancer women care about is breast cancer.
More than four times as many women get lung cancer as breast cancer.
More women smoke than men.
The breast cancer people get way more donations than the lung cancer people do.
So no surprise that women are against preventing another cancer that only they can get.
Yes, smoking is bad. Yes, it can kill you (although there is evidence to suggest that there is a genetic factor that plays a role in whether a smoker will get cancer or not). Is it the sole cause of all of our lung cancer? Doubtful. It is A cause of lung cancer.
The more important point, I think, is to look at EVERY scrap of information with a critical eye. Do not accept claims as truth without investigating it for yourself.
But, concerning smoking, he has a legitimate question, but I think there is more than one answer. These are my observations.
1. As he says, smoking does cause cancer, but maybe not as much as statistics suggest.
2. The second hand smoke issue is dubious and while it can cause cancer, you would be hard pressd to get a serious estimate of how many cancers it does cause. Not zero, but the actal hard data is nonexistant or never actually stated.
3. Smoking and second hand smoke cause other serious problems with COPD being the elephant in the room. I think COPD may be enough reason to ban smoking.
4. Medical statistics are horribly inaccuate and official designation of cause of death is often wrong or ignores the complication of multiple contributing factors. (Diabetes, for instance can provide a stimulus for cancer as it compromises the immune system.)
5. Lots of other chemicals cause or facilitate cancer but the doctors and the lobbyists are happy to stay away from blaming corporations and the failure of goverment oversight of our food, workplace and household/garden chemicals.
6. I would point out that 40+ years ago, a lot of folks died of other causes at earlier ages before cancer (from smoking or any source) could get them. Example: Heart attacks for late middle-age men were much more often fatal in the 1950-1970 period but these people live longer now to die of something else.
7. I would also point out that many of the cancer cures are bogus since many cancers are treated when they would not have developed to become a problem. There are a lot of women with mastectomies and men with prostate surgery for cancer that would have gone unnoticed decades earlier and never developed to be a problem. (Some cures are real but most just suck our money and insurance money into the big fat feeding trough of the medical machine.)
It does not take much reading of the medical and scientific literature to realize medice is a business first and an occasional health improvement is only lucky frindge benefit.